Distracted driving

Are rural states more distracted?

December 9, 2024

Distracted driving is widespread across the United States. While no driver is immune from distracted driving, not all drivers face the same levels of risk. Distraction levels vary from state to state. For instance, the most distracted state is 33% more distracted than the national average.

Why does distracted driving look different across states? Legislation and safety strategies are big factors. Drivers in states without hands-free laws are 9.5% more distracted than drivers in states with hands-free legislation, and states with hefty fines and effective awareness campaigns have reduced distraction by over 20% since 2022.

Another factor that impacts distracted driving is how rural or urban a state is.

To understand the impact of rural and urban settings on distracted driving, we combined state-by-state urbanization data with our phone motion data. To determine how urban every state is, we used FiveThirtyEight’s “urbanization index” — an analysis based on “the average number of people living within 5 miles of every census tract.” We classified states as urban or rural by averaging the urbanization index and dividing them into two groups: those above and below the average.

We found that drivers in rural states are more distracted than their urban counterparts. On average, drivers in rural states were nearly 11% more distracted than drivers in urban states. 

The impact of this 10.7% higher level of distracted driving among the 58 million drivers in rural states is more crashes caused by phone use behind the wheel. Compared to urban states, this resulted in an estimated 33,000 more crashes, 18,000 injuries, 150 fatalities, and $1.3 billion in economic damages in 2023. (These figures are based on CMT research that shows that for every 10% increase in distracted driving, the rate of severe injuries and fatalities rises by 1.5%.)

The difference in distraction between urban and rural states is nearly identical to the difference in distraction between states with hands-free laws and states without them. This could be because urban states are more likely to be hands-free. It could also be due to rural states having fewer drivers and roads with fewer obstacles, which can give people a false sense of security when using their phones while driving. This was present in the early days of the pandemic when drivers stopped using their cars, roads cleared out, and distraction surged.

You can find the distraction levels of the urbanization index for each state in the table below.

StateDriversUrbanization IndexPhone Motion DistractionCategoryHands-Free
Alabama4,061,8379.610:02:05RuralYes
Alaska519,2888.740:01:40RuralNo
Arizona5,795,21611.30:01:32UrbanYes
Arkansas2,306,9219.260:01:49RuralNo
California27,112,59512.190:01:39UrbanYes
Colorado4,411,58711.150:01:27UrbanNo
Connecticut2,606,39611.410:01:30UrbanYes
Delaware848,50411.010:01:44UrbanYes
Florida16,144,30211.460:01:27UrbanNo
Georgia7,663,84710.550:01:50UrbanYes
Hawaii917,46411.090:01:20UrbanYes
Idaho1,343,4539.590:01:37RuralYes
Illinois8,364,84311.620:01:26UrbanYes
Indiana4,636,11410.410:01:28UrbanYes
Iowa2,345,3559.590:01:43RuralNo
Kansas2,089,70710.120:01:59RuralNo
Kentucky2,980,3319.790:01:43RuralNo
Louisiana3,437,73310.180:02:07RuralNo
Maine1,056,5359.040:01:25RuralYes
Maryland4,439,75711.710:01:38UrbanYes
Massachusetts4,899,93111.840:01:37UrbanYes
Michigan7,982,47110.810:01:43UrbanYes
Minnesota4,143,27210.460:01:27UrbanYes
Mississippi2,032,7758.910:02:08RuralNo
Missouri4,275,22810.20:01:44RuralYes
Montana856,6968.470:01:45RuralNo
Nebraska1,438,84210.20:01:50RuralNo
Nevada2,150,70711.770:01:30UrbanYes
New Hampshire1,174,8269.920:01:16RuralYes
New Jersey6,461,95012.240:01:29UrbanYes
New Mexico1,477,2139.90:01:34RuralNo
New York11,879,05712.560:01:29UrbanYes
North Carolina7,765,10910.320:02:06RuralNo
North Dakota549,7219.050:01:44RuralNo
Ohio8,283,54610.880:01:34UrbanYes
Oklahoma2,597,4419.940:01:49RuralNo
Oregon3,029,91210.710:01:07UrbanYes
Pennslyvania9,098,57011.150:0143UrbanNo
Rhode Island754,50711.720:02:11UrbanYes
South Carolina3,990,90910.110:02:06RuralNo
South Dakota671,1498.730:01:45RuralNo
Tennessee5,009,69710.20:01:43RuralYes
Texas18,297,90011.170:01:37UrbanNo
Utah2,207,20810.960:01:31UrbanNo
Vermont469,6248.840:01:14RuralYes
Virginia5,912,64410.910:01:45UrbanYes
Washington5,868,50911.120:01:17UrbanYes
West Virginia1,138,2909.110:01:33RuralYes
Wisconsin4,340,85110.190:01:16RuralNo
Wyoming430,4728.260:01:41RuralNo

Zooming in on distraction in rural states

The difference in distraction rates between urban and rural states is similar to what we find between hands-free and non-hands-free states. However, the impact of hands-free laws is even more evident when comparing rural states without these laws to rural and urban states that do. 

Rural states without hands-free laws see 14.7% more distracted driving than urban states with hands-free laws. This means that drivers in rural states without hands-free enforcement are 2.3% more likely to be injured in a serious crash caused by a distracted driver than in an urban state that’s hands-free. 

The impact of hands-free laws is amplified when looking at rural states with and without hands-free legislation. The five most rural states with hands-free laws saw 14.8% less distraction than rural states without — with drivers averaging 1 minute and 32 seconds of distraction. To learn more about distracted driving in each state and for nationwide trends, read our 2024 report.